Thu Dec 15 13:27:17 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony 1.1.5 RC packaging issues
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony 1.1.5 RC packaging issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> - configure looks for plpgsql.so during the build but does not actually >> need it during the build. This is a bit annoying as it requires you to >> install the server package when you don't need it. > > fixed in -HEAD The other items seem to be mostly addressed; this one seems to deserve a bit more comment. The "search for plpgsql.so" is there to ensure that it'll be there at runtime in that plenty of the Slony-I functionality operates as pl/pgsql functions. Does the distinction between build/compile time and install/run time warrant dropping the check? If I'm installing from source (e.g. - NOT doing anything with .rpm/.deb), I think I want that check. The case where checking for the lib is unwarranted is where we're building packages in one place, and then using dependancies to make sure that all components (including plpgsql.so) are installed. Again, does the distinction between build/compile time and install/run time warrant dropping the check?
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony 1.1.5 RC packaging issues
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony 1.1.5 RC packaging issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list