Right, Steve mentioned as much on #slony earlier. My understanding from his
and your comment, and the documentation, is that I'll need to follow the
sequence below:

1. Create a new, empty set
2. Subscribe all old nodes to the new set
3. Do 'set move table' and 'set move sequence' for the tables and sequences
to split out
4. Finally, subscribe the new node to only this new set

Will that do what I want, without disturbing the already-loaded tables on
the old nodes?
 Den 8 apr 2012 02:35 skrev "Vick Khera" <vivek at khera.org>:

> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Johan Wärlander <johan at snowflake.nu>
> wrote:
> > Do I just add a new set with these particular tables, even though they
> > already exist in set1? Will this add a lot of traffic, or simply reuse
> the
> > existing logs?
>
> The sets need to be non-intersecting.
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at lists.slony.info
> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20120408/3a052f1a/attachment.htm