Sat Apr 7 17:35:17 PDT 2012
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Second replication set as a subset of the first?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Second replication set as a subset of the first?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Johan Wärlander <johan at snowflake.nu> wrote: > Do I just add a new set with these particular tables, even though they > already exist in set1? Will this add a lot of traffic, or simply reuse the > existing logs? The sets need to be non-intersecting.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Second replication set as a subset of the first?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Second replication set as a subset of the first?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list