On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info> wrote:
> On 11-11-23 04:28 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Steve Singer<ssinger at ca.afilias.info>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11-11-20 05:47 AM, Cédric Villemain wrote:
>>>>
>
>>
>> ISTM that setting the remote worker to REPEATABLE READ would work well
>> for this case. Patch attached.
>>
>
> Simon, Did you forget to attach the patch? I don't see it.

Looks that way.

-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: rem_worker_repeatable_read.v1.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 575 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20111123/ac08e246/attachment.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: read_only_patch.v2.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1071 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20111123/ac08e246/attachment-0001.obj