Wed Nov 10 05:15:26 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Does Slony ever "abandon" connections?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Does Slony ever "abandon" connections?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 10-11-09 07:13 PM, Richard Yen wrote: > Hmm, that seems to make sense. Given that Daylight Savings Time just > ended, that might explain the reason why it got abandoned, since my slon > procs run on a central/remote server > > Leads me to a separate question: are there pros/cons to running the slon > app on a remote server rather than on the local server? Seems like it > makes administration easer--but at the cost of increased network traffic? > > Do you have any insight to this? Administration is easier, it MIGHT simplify your security procedures (you could have all the db servers 'trust' one admin server or have a .pgpass file in the one admin server instead of passwords spread out everywhere). But it will increase network traffic. I'd say that at a minimum I would try to have the slon running on the same LAN segment as the database instance it is serving. The latency of running slon over a WAN might be an issue + slon does not deal well with network outages that tend to be more common on a WAN. Our dba team tends to run the slons from central admin servers and I think they are happy with how it works out. > > --Richard > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info > <mailto:ssinger at ca.afilias.info>> wrote: > > On 10-11-09 11:09 AM, Richard Yen wrote: > > Hi, does anyone know if slony ever "abandons" connections? I've > had an > idle transaction for the past 6 hours on one of my subscriber nodes, > and according to my logs, the transaction was started, but there was > never any action done in it, except to set the transaction level to > serializable > > Odd thing is--the node is not lagging from the origin when I > look at the > origin's sl_status table > > Also, I don't know if this might be relevant, but the backend > for the > transaction has been open since 2010-11-01, and it's been processing > plenty of transactions successfully up until this point > > How else can I diagnose this problem? > --Richard > > > > First I would determine which slon process the connection comes from > (pg_stat_activity matched to the process id). > > If the slon is the 'local' to the slave database (that is, this is > the slon servicing the node that is reporting the idle connection) > then you need to figure out which thread the has stopped. > > Have you changed the time/date on your server recently? > Do you see traffic in the logs from localListener, cleanupThread? > the sync thread? > > > If it is a remote connection, then what was the last thing that > remote listener did. > > Slony doesn't normally abandon connections but it is possible > something went wrong. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > Slony1-general at lists.slony.info > <mailto:Slony1-general at lists.slony.info> > http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general > > >
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Does Slony ever "abandon" connections?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Does Slony ever "abandon" connections?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list