Wed Apr 7 09:52:17 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Fixing a confused slony
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Fixing a confused slony
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Apr 7, 2010, at 12:56 AM, Stéphane A. Schildknecht wrote: > Hi, > > In fact, Slony did not get confused. sl_status is a view composed with > information from sl_event and sl_confirm. > Until every event referencing the deleted nodes disappear from these tables, > you will see these nodes in sl_status. > > The fact that these nodes are not shown in sl_nodes is a good way to know they > don't exist in the cluster anymore. Right, I got that, but I'm unclear why some nodes might exist in sl_confirm "long" after they've been removed. I thought (incorrectly, it seems) that one of the fallouts of the DROP NODE command was that all references to that node would be culled.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Fixing a confused slony
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Fixing a confused slony
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list