Wed Apr 7 00:56:07 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Fixing a confused slony
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Fixing a confused slony
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Le 07/04/2010 03:42, Ben Chobot a écrit : > On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Ben Chobot wrote: > >> In our maintenance today we managed to confuse slony 1.2.20 by adding and dropping nodes. Now, sl_status shows nodes we have deleted, while sl_node correctly shows those nodes as gone. >> >> Any advice on how to clean up slony's config? The nodes in sl_node seem to be replicating correctly.... it's just a matter of removing all references to the deleted ones. > > Actually, it seems that after an hour or so slony is no longer confused, which leaves me confused. :( > > Why might slony be in such an apparently (but not really?) inconsistent state? Hi, In fact, Slony did not get confused. sl_status is a view composed with information from sl_event and sl_confirm. Until every event referencing the deleted nodes disappear from these tables, you will see these nodes in sl_status. The fact that these nodes are not shown in sl_nodes is a good way to know they don't exist in the cluster anymore. Best regards, - -- Stéphane Schildknecht -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAku8OgoACgkQA+REPKWGI0GlpwCfUiqkZwN5XdpePfAhcUEADwMe 1swAoMuOoxZGp0G4KgtLsxt54rvXegQZ =F7D6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Fixing a confused slony
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Fixing a confused slony
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list