Tue Oct 2 14:48:33 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] command_on_logarchive option
- Next message: [Slony1-general] command_on_logarchive option
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JP Fletcher <jpfletch at ca.afilias.info> writes: > I'm experimenting with logshipping (v.1.2.11) and am using, for the > first time, the option in the slon conf file: > > command_on_logarchive > > I created a shell script that this command calls which applies syncs > archives after they are written: > > command_on_logarchive="/opt/clusters/cluster1_slony/archive/apply_archive.sh" > > My cluster has four nodes, not counting the log shipped replica, 8141, > 8142, 8143, and 8194. Node 8194 is the provider to the logshipped > node, so I only configured 'command_on_logarchive' for the slon > servicing this node, my assumption is that this is correct. Nodes > 8143, and 8141 are origins for sets. > > When I started things up, everything appeared to be fine. The slon > successfully applied 37 archives, each originating on either node 8141 > or 8143. The 38th archive, however, and several subsequent archives > originated on node 8142. The slon made no attempt to apply these > archives. This left the archive counter on 37. The next archive the > slon attempted to apply was from node 8143, and expected the archive > counter to be on 48, which of course it was not, and everything went > pear-shaped. I have three questions: > > 1. Should I have expected the command_on_logarchive option to work, > and if so, did i do something wrong? Hopefully apply_archive.sh looked something like: #!/bin/sh PGBINDIR=???? ${PGBINDIR}/slony_logshipper $1 That might be hoped to work, although not quite right yet in 1.2.11 :-(. > 2. Why does the slon not try to apply archives from node8142? slon shouldn't; I think you're meaning the slony_logshipper... > 3. Why are there archives from a node that is not active (no events > should have originated on 8142, and no archive files exist for the > other non-origin node)? The node that isn't active should have very few, very infrequent, archives that are devoid of actual content (beyond the headers). It is expected that there *will* be some events coming from other nodes, as every node does generate events, even if infrequently. The behaviour will change a bit in 1.2.12; Jan just committed some changes at the end of last week to fix up the handling of sequencing of the archives, which turned out to be (sigh) troublesome. -- select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'cbbrowne.com'; http://cbbrowne.com/info/ Rules of the Evil Overlord #79. "If my doomsday device happens to come with a reverse switch, as soon as it has been employed it will be melted down and made into limited-edition commemorative coins." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] command_on_logarchive option
- Next message: [Slony1-general] command_on_logarchive option
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list