On 4/5/07, Jan Wieck <JanWieck at yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 4/5/2007 12:13 PM, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
> > On April 5, 2007 09:11 am, David Fetter wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:52:06AM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
> >> > I had a chat with Jan about some of the forthcoming changes we're
> >> > thinking about for the next major version...
> >> >
> >> > In general, there's a thought of doing a fairly *enormous* amount of
> >> > cleanup, falling fundamentally out of the presence of hooks in PG 8.3
> >> > that will allow Slony-I to work without any of the current catalog
> >> > corruptions.  The cleanup we're thinking of is of extensive enough
> >> > nature that it might even be that "version 2.0" would only work with
> >> > PG 8.3 'and above.'
> >> >
> >> > The scope of that, in total, I'll let Jan comment on, so as to allow
> >> > debate on the merits of that.
> >> >
> >> > I'll draw back to a rather smaller, but not unimportant, matter...
> >> >
> >> > My position at this point is that dropping the "TABLE ADD KEY" feature
> >> > is highly desirable.
> >>
> >> +1 on dropping it.  This is a case where "helping" people to shoot
> >> themselves in the foot really isn't helping them.
> >
> > +1 here.  I think I've already voiced my thougt on this in an earlyer email as
> > well. :-)
> >
>
> It was a misfeature to begin with.

+1 for reasons previously expressed.

Andrew