Thu Apr 5 12:17:46 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] TABLE ADD KEY deprecation
- Next message: [Slony1-general] TABLE ADD KEY deprecation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4/5/2007 12:13 PM, Darcy Buskermolen wrote: > On April 5, 2007 09:11 am, David Fetter wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:52:06AM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote: >> > I had a chat with Jan about some of the forthcoming changes we're >> > thinking about for the next major version... >> > >> > In general, there's a thought of doing a fairly *enormous* amount of >> > cleanup, falling fundamentally out of the presence of hooks in PG 8.3 >> > that will allow Slony-I to work without any of the current catalog >> > corruptions. The cleanup we're thinking of is of extensive enough >> > nature that it might even be that "version 2.0" would only work with >> > PG 8.3 'and above.' >> > >> > The scope of that, in total, I'll let Jan comment on, so as to allow >> > debate on the merits of that. >> > >> > I'll draw back to a rather smaller, but not unimportant, matter... >> > >> > My position at this point is that dropping the "TABLE ADD KEY" feature >> > is highly desirable. >> >> +1 on dropping it. This is a case where "helping" people to shoot >> themselves in the foot really isn't helping them. > > +1 here. I think I've already voiced my thougt on this in an earlyer email as > well. :-) > It was a misfeature to begin with. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck at Yahoo.com #
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] TABLE ADD KEY deprecation
- Next message: [Slony1-general] TABLE ADD KEY deprecation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list