> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiroshi Saito [mailto:saito at inetrt.skcapi.co.jp] 
> Sent: 05 July 2005 08:31
> To: Dave Page; slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org
> Cc: Magnus Hagander; Andreas
> Subject: Re: Service handling of Slon
> 
> > No - there is not sl_ctl at present, so we should not add 
> one. We only
> > did that on PostgreSQL because pg_ctl already existed. Adding the
> > service code directly to slon is no problem anyway - that's 
> how I did it
> > with pg_autovacuum.
> 
> Ooops, Do you work service into slon?

Not yet, but if Magnus gets short of time when he's porting the rest of
it, I can help out with that.

> From the main of slon  to control exec slon process.
> Probably, you are the thought which solves a HUP problem.:-)

>From a brief glance at the code, HUP just restarts slon using
slon_kill_child() & execvp() so putting in a huge amount of work to
emulate signals is probably of little benefit (unless I missed
something), given that the SCM makes it nice and easy to restart a
service on Windows.

/D