Thu Dec 15 15:49:50 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony 1.1.5 RC packaging issues
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony 1.1.5 RC packaging issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> - configure looks for plpgsql.so during the build but does not >>> actually need it during the build. This is a bit annoying as it >>> requires you to install the server package when you don't need it. >> >> fixed in -HEAD > > The other items seem to be mostly addressed; this one seems to deserve a > bit more comment. > > The "search for plpgsql.so" is there to ensure that it'll be there at > runtime in that plenty of the Slony-I functionality operates as pl/pgsql > functions. > > Does the distinction between build/compile time and install/run time > warrant dropping the check? > > If I'm installing from source (e.g. - NOT doing anything with .rpm/.deb), > I think I want that check. > > > The case where checking for the lib is unwarranted is where we're > building packages in one place, and then using dependancies to make sure > that all components (including plpgsql.so) are installed. > > Again, does the distinction between build/compile time and install/run > time warrant dropping the check? > I have changed the check behaviour in -HEAD to be in 'dummy' mode by default. So it checks for the .so, BUT can be overriden. If you specify --with-pgpkglibdir=mydir, then it assumes that you know what you are talking about and just uses that path. It also does that for the .sample file.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony 1.1.5 RC packaging issues
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony 1.1.5 RC packaging issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list