On Saturday 10 December 2005 16:56, cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info wrote:
> >> I expect that there is a greater risk that this would have painful
> >> side-effects, as changes to the buildsystem affect everyone doing
> >> packaging.  Again, Devrim is probably the one most directly affected, so
> >> if he gets anxious about a proposed patch, that would be the source of
> >> the go/no-go...
> >
> > I talked to Devrim on IRC about this and decided not to backport the
> > changes.
>
> Excellent.  (Well, arguably "unfortunate"!)
>
> It's good, at least, that this matter shouldn't throw up any last minute
> "red flags."  I know Devrim has had reason to be irritated at the time of
> some past releases.
>
> It really points to the notion that we ought to consider whether or not we
> have everything we really desire for a 1.2 release, and start to try to
> get that to materialize.
>
> I was really hoping for a move to pgFoundry to be a 1.2 thing; that
> doesn't seem to be happening fast :-(.

I hope to be able to spend some more time here in the next little bit on 
pgfoundry issues, though I do have a couple of work related items that must 
come first.


>
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general

-- 
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.

http://www.wavefire.com
ph: 250.717.0200
fx: 250.763.1759