On October 20, 2004 04:55 am, cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info wrote:
> > On Tuesday October 19 2004 9:16, Jan Wieck wrote:
> >> > So if I want to work with the latest code slated for 1.0.3, is that on
> >> > the HEAD?  REL_1_0_STABLE?
> >>
> >> REL_1_0_STABLE is what's going to be 1.0.3 in a couple of hours. I'm
> >> right now pushing it through a number of TPC-W loads on 8.0 databases.
> >> Awesome couple ... all I can say.
> >
> > Not sure where you're going with 1.0.3/1.1, but will you consider
> > applying some patches from 1.1 to 1.0.3?  Config file and logging come to
> > mind...
>
> I'd oppose that, unless there are some _very_ carefully selected changes,
> and I seriously doubt that's possible.
>
> The "config file" changes in particular cause a significant change in
> functionality, essentially _breaking_ existing configurations,
> documentation, and scripts for managing Slony-I instances.

I made every effort I could think of  to allow the existing 1.0 behavior of 
command line options still valid for -HEAD. Chris is there something specific 
you are seeing that deviates from -STABLE ?


>
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general

-- 
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
ph: 250.717.0200
fx:  250.763.1759
http://www.wavefire.com