Fri Jul 23 21:02:44 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Beginners setup help
- Next message: [Slony1-general] partitioning with replication
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sheesh....just need to get my eyes uncrossed.... Well, that's good to know. Nobody has commented on the feasability/desirability of adding a partitioning capability to the replication as in my original question.... - DAP -----Original Message----- From: David Fetter [mailto:david at fetter.org] Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 4:47 PM To: Dan Wright Cc: David Parker; slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] partitioning with replication On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 06:15:55PM -0400, Dan Wright wrote: > It sounds like you are doing the kind of thing that table inheritance > is supposed to solve. If you use inheritance in your DB tables, you > could get exactly what you are asking for from slony right now. Table inheritance is a Bad Thing(TM) in its current implementation. Please find attached an example of why this is so. Cheers, D -- David Fetter david at fetter.org http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote!
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Beginners setup help
- Next message: [Slony1-general] partitioning with replication
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list