David Parker dparker
Fri Jul 23 21:02:44 PDT 2004
Sheesh....just need to get my eyes uncrossed....

Well, that's good to know.

Nobody has commented on the feasability/desirability of adding a
partitioning capability to the replication as in my original
question....

- DAP

-----Original Message-----
From: David Fetter [mailto:david at fetter.org] 
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 4:47 PM
To: Dan Wright
Cc: David Parker; slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] partitioning with replication

On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 06:15:55PM -0400, Dan Wright wrote:

> It sounds like you are doing the kind of thing that table inheritance 
> is supposed to solve.  If you use inheritance in your DB tables, you 
> could get exactly what you are asking for from slony right now.

Table inheritance is a Bad Thing(TM) in its current implementation.
Please find attached an example of why this is so.

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david at fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100   mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!



More information about the Slony1-general mailing list