Wed Dec 15 06:02:12 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-bugs] [Bug 172] Use application_name
- Next message: [Slony1-bugs] [Bug 172] Use application_name
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172 --- Comment #6 from Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info> 2010-12-15 06:02:12 PST --- In the first patch you add a stored function store_application_name() wouldn't it be better for your change to slonik to use this function instead of duplicating the logic? I realize that there is a bit of a chicken/egg situation here in that until slonik installs the slony schema the function doesn't exist so it can't be called. I am also not sure how I feel about querying the catalog pg_settings table for application name to see what version we are on. The other way of approaching this is to check the server version on from the pg connection data structures and not set the application name accordingly OR we can have a no-op implementation of store_application_name() for versions < 9.0. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
- Previous message: [Slony1-bugs] [Bug 172] Use application_name
- Next message: [Slony1-bugs] [Bug 172] Use application_name
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-bugs mailing list