On Fri, 24 Aug 2018, David Fetter wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I'd like to get your take on $Subject. As the project lacked a time
> machine, it was not possible to make the part installed inside the DB
> an EXTENSION in the first place. For reasons of sanity, would be
> convenient to make it one now.
>
> The part where it seems like there may be technical issues in the
> implementation is the script-to-be, slony1--unpackaged--1.0.sql when
> there are multiple replication sets, possibly with multiple versions
> of the software.  Should that be supported, and if so, how?

How do you envision slony working as an extension?
What would happen when someone calls 'create extension...'

Would this replace 'store node' or would the slonik code in 'store node...' 
call 'create extension...'



>
> Best,
> David.
> -- 
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
> Phone: +1 415 235 3778
>
> Remember to vote!
> Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-hackers mailing list
> Slony1-hackers at lists.slony.info
> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-hackers
>