Fri Sep 28 08:36:26 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-hackers] Re: XID in PG core/contrib
- Next message: [Slony1-hackers] Re: XID in PG core/contrib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/28/2007 10:33 AM, Marko Kreen wrote: > On 9/28/07, Tom Lane <tgl at sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> "Marko Kreen" <markokr at gmail.com> writes: >> > bool txid_not_visible_in_snapshot(int8, snap) >> >> The last seems pretty thoroughly redundant? > > Ehhee. Jan, it's 2:1 now. I also think it unecessary. Yeah, yeah ... I can live without it. It's just, from that point of view half of all comparison operators are redundant ;-) > >> > - removed use of "unsigned long long" in txid_snapshot_out, >> > instead I try to guess the correct fromat string for uint64 >> > from HAVE_LONG_INT_64 >> >> What's to guess? Use UINT64_FORMAT > > Thanks, I failed to notice it for some reason. > > New patch attached, both things fixed. I'll look at it later today, if I find a free minute to breathe! Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck at Yahoo.com #
- Previous message: [Slony1-hackers] Re: XID in PG core/contrib
- Next message: [Slony1-hackers] Re: XID in PG core/contrib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-hackers mailing list