<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">>Can I simply not have paths between slaves, and avoid the performance
penalty?<br><br>That's kind of like saying "I want a car, but I don't want it to have an engine because<br>I'm never going to use the gas pedal".<br><br>If you don't have paths, it won't work. Slony needs paths to know were to send that data.<br>Likewise, it needs to know if the data got to the slaves, hence the "chatter".<br><br><div id="RTEContent"><font size="4"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 255);">Melvin Davidson </span></font><br><br></div><br>--- On <b>Wed, 5/5/10, John Moran <i><johnfrederickmoran@gmail.com></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>From: John Moran <johnfrederickmoran@gmail.com><br>Subject: [Slony1-general] I don't want failover; Can I skip chatter between slaves?<br>To: slony1-general@lists.slony.info<br>Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 4:52 PM<br><br><div class="plainMail">Hi,<br><br>I'm not interested
in failover; it doesn't make sense for my domain.<br>I'd like to use Slony, without paying for the overhead of "chatter"<br>between slaves; they don't need to SYNC between each other, because<br>I'll never failover or switchover.<br><br>Can I simply not have paths between slaves, and avoid the performance penalty?<br><br>Thanks,<br>John Moran<br>_______________________________________________<br>Slony1-general mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:Slony1-general@lists.slony.info" href="/mc/compose?to=Slony1-general@lists.slony.info">Slony1-general@lists.slony.info</a><br><a href="http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general" target="_blank">http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general</a><br></div></blockquote></td></tr></table><br>