On 9 November 2016 at 06:23, Nawaz Ahmed <nawazid at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> I am currently facing a severity issue for one of our clients using a Slony
> replication. I sent the email as below yesterday to the mailing list but I
> have not received a confirmation if it had been posted due to the size of
> the email limit. Could you please take a look into this and respond.
>
>
>
> 1) what is the query to get the version of slony running in a configuration,
> I ran the below but i get an error that it could not find the function
>
> SELECT slonyversion();

That function resides in the cluster's schema.

So based on what I see elsewhere, that will likely work better as

select _slony_fesprod.slonyversion();

>
> 2) I have a situation where a slony replication is lagging by about 17 hours
> as shown below by the output of queries. I wanted to find out how to monitor
> the real time progress of the replication.
>
> Prod
>
> =# Select * from _slony_fesprod.sl_status;
>  st_origin | st_received | st_last_event |       st_last_event_ts        |
> st_last_received |      s
> t_last_received_ts      |   st_last_received_event_ts   | st_lag_num_events
> |   st_lag_time
> -----------+-------------+---------------+-------------------------------+------------------+-------
> ------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------+-----------------
>          1 |           2 |    5000029683 | 2016-11-08 16:47:52.115885+11 |
> 5000002086 | 2016-1
> 1-08 14:52:13.194869+11 | 2016-11-07 22:52:56.616984+11 |             27597
> | 17:54:56.977821
> (1 row)
>
>
> prod=# select con_origin, con_received,
> prod-# max(ev_seqno) as last_event,
> prod-# max(con_seqno) as last_replicated,
> prod-# max(ev_seqno) - max(con_seqno) as behind
> prod-# from _slony_prod.sl_confirm, _slony_prod.sl_event
> prod-# where con_origin = ev_origin
> prod-# and con_origin = _slony_prod.getLocalNodeId('_slony_prod')
> prod-# group by 1, 2;
>  con_origin | con_received | last_event | last_replicated | behind
> ------------+--------------+------------+-----------------+--------
>           1 |            2 | 5000029688 |      5000002086 |  27602
> (1 row)
>
>
> Slony replication
>
>  prod_read90=# Select * from _slony_fesprod.sl_status;
>  st_origin | st_received | st_last_event |       st_last_event_ts        |
> st_last_received |      s
> t_last_received_ts      |   st_last_received_event_ts   | st_lag_num_events
> |   st_lag_time
> -----------+-------------+---------------+-------------------------------+------------------+-------
> ------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------+-----------------
>          2 |           1 |    5000006454 | 2016-11-08 16:48:34.795058+11 |
> 5000000003 | 2016-1
> 1-08 14:52:13.213799+11 | 2016-11-07 22:52:52.757921+11 |              6451
> | 17:55:49.179167
> (1 row)
>
> prod_read90=# select con_origin, con_received,
> prod_read90-# max(ev_seqno) as last_event,
> prod_read90-# max(con_seqno) as last_replicated,
> prod_read90-# max(ev_seqno) - max(con_seqno) as behind
> prod_read90-# from _slony_fesprod.sl_confirm, _slony_fesprod.sl_event
> prod_read90-# where con_origin = ev_origin
> prod_read90-# and con_origin =
> _slony_fesprod.getLocalNodeId('_slony_fesprod')
> group by 1, 2;
> prod_read90-# group by 1, 2;
>  con_origin | con_received | last_event | last_replicated | behind
> ------------+--------------+------------+-----------------+--------
>           2 |            1 | 5000006455 |      5000000003 |   6452
> (1 row)
>
>
> 3) The below query seems to increase on both sides, does this mean the
> replication is progressing ?if yes, then why do we still have the lag in
> sl_status tables.
>
> # select max(ev_seqno) from _slony_fesprod.sl_event;
>
>
> 4) The situation in item 2 above has become worse now as shown below, the
> lag is getting close to 2 days now. Is there any query that I can get to
> know if the replication is catching up or halted etc.
>
>
> prod_read90=#  select * from  _slony_fesprod.sl_status ;
> st_origin | st_received | st_last_event |      st_last_event_ts        |
> st_last_received |      st_last_received_ts      |  st_last_rec
> eived_event_ts  | st_lag_num_events |      st_lag_time
> -----------+-------------+---------------+-------------------------------+------------------+-------------------------------+--------------
> -----------------+-------------------+-----------------------
>         2 |          1 |    5000016276 | 2016-11-09 20:05:18.993157+11 |
> 5000000003 | 2016-11-08 14:52:13.213799+11 | 2016-11-07 22
> :52:52.757921+11 |            16273 | 1 day 21:12:31.769221
> (1 row)
>
>
> I can send more output from the sl_event and sl_confirm from both the sides
> if needed.
>
>
> Regards,
> Nawaz Ahmed
> +61 414 513 643
>
>
>
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
> From: Nawaz Ahmed <nawazid at yahoo.com>
> To: "slony1-general at lists.slony.info" <slony1-general at lists.slony.info>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 5:10 PM
> Subject: Replication lag
>
> Hi Team,
>
> I have a few queries with respect the monitoring and troubleshooting of
> slony replication for one of our clients. The questions are listed below.
>
> 1) what is the query to get the version of slony running in a configuration,
> I ran the below but i get an error that it could not find the function
>
> SELECT slonyversion();
>
>
> 2) I have a situation where a slony replication is lagging by about 17 hours
> as shown below by the output of queries. I wanted to find out how to monitor
> the real time progress of the replication.
>
> Prod
>
> =# Select * from _slony_fesprod.sl_status;
>  st_origin | st_received | st_last_event |       st_last_event_ts        |
> st_last_received |      s
> t_last_received_ts      |   st_last_received_event_ts   | st_lag_num_events
> |   st_lag_time
> -----------+-------------+---------------+-------------------------------+------------------+-------
> ------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------+-----------------
>          1 |           2 |    5000029683 | 2016-11-08 16:47:52.115885+11 |
> 5000002086 | 2016-1
> 1-08 14:52:13.194869+11 | 2016-11-07 22:52:56.616984+11 |             27597
> | 17:54:56.977821
> (1 row)
>
>
> prod=# select con_origin, con_received,
> prod-# max(ev_seqno) as last_event,
> prod-# max(con_seqno) as last_replicated,
> prod-# max(ev_seqno) - max(con_seqno) as behind
> prod-# from _slony_prod.sl_confirm, _slony_prod.sl_event
> prod-# where con_origin = ev_origin
> prod-# and con_origin = _slony_prod.getLocalNodeId('_slony_prod')
> prod-# group by 1, 2;
>  con_origin | con_received | last_event | last_replicated | behind
> ------------+--------------+------------+-----------------+--------
>           1 |            2 | 5000029688 |      5000002086 |  27602
> (1 row)
>
>
> Slony replication
>
>  prod_read90=# Select * from _slony_fesprod.sl_status;
>  st_origin | st_received | st_last_event |       st_last_event_ts        |
> st_last_received |      s
> t_last_received_ts      |   st_last_received_event_ts   | st_lag_num_events
> |   st_lag_time
> -----------+-------------+---------------+-------------------------------+------------------+-------
> ------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------+-----------------
>          2 |           1 |    5000006454 | 2016-11-08 16:48:34.795058+11 |
> 5000000003 | 2016-1
> 1-08 14:52:13.213799+11 | 2016-11-07 22:52:52.757921+11 |              6451
> | 17:55:49.179167
> (1 row)
>
> prod_read90=# select con_origin, con_received,
> prod_read90-# max(ev_seqno) as last_event,
> prod_read90-# max(con_seqno) as last_replicated,
> prod_read90-# max(ev_seqno) - max(con_seqno) as behind
> prod_read90-# from _slony_fesprod.sl_confirm, _slony_fesprod.sl_event
> prod_read90-# where con_origin = ev_origin
> prod_read90-# and con_origin =
> _slony_fesprod.getLocalNodeId('_slony_fesprod')
> group by 1, 2;
> prod_read90-# group by 1, 2;
>  con_origin | con_received | last_event | last_replicated | behind
> ------------+--------------+------------+-----------------+--------
>           2 |            1 | 5000006455 |      5000000003 |   6452
> (1 row)
>
>
> 3) The below query seems to increase on both sides, does this mean the
> replication is progressing ?if yes, then why do we still have the lag in
> sl_status tables.
>
> # select max(ev_seqno) from _slony_fesprod.sl_event;

If replication is successfully running, then you should find that the
last applied SYNC will be increasing.

It looks as though the last replicated SYNC is 5000002086, which is
suggestive that some changes are getting applied.

I'd suggest looking at the logs generated by the slon process that is
managing node #2.

You might need to bump the logging level up to DEBUG1; that generates
pretty useful output for figuring out what's going on.  That's done by
having slon run with "-d 2" or having log_level set to 2 in the config
file (if that's how you're configuring slon)

There is a section in the documentation on this; see particularly 5.5.6.6
http://slony.info/documentation/2.2/loganalysis.html

Interesting bits of what you should expect to see (particularly with -d 2)

DEBUG1: remoteWorkerThread_%d: SYNC %d processing

This indicates the start of processing of a SYNC

DEBUG2: remoteWorkerThread_%d: syncing set %d with %d table(s) from provider %d

This is declaring the plans for a SYNC: we have a set with some tables
to process.

DEBUG2: remoteWorkerThread_%d: SYNC %d done in %.3f seconds

This indicates the successful completion of a SYNC. Hurray!

DEBUG1: remoteWorkerThread_%d_d:%.3f seconds delay for first row

This indicates how long it took to get the first row from the LOG
cursor that pulls in data from the sl_log tables.

DEBUG2: remoteWorkerThread_%d_d:%.3f seconds until close cursor

This indicates how long it took to complete reading data from the LOG
cursor that pulls in data from the sl_log tables.

DEBUG2: remoteWorkerThread_%d_d: inserts=%d updates=%d deletes=%d

This reports how much activity was recorded in the current SYNC set.

Those are the things you should be hoping to see processing, and if
replication is well behind, slon should often be processing several
SYNCs in one group.

If you are encountering ERROR messages, they should be pretty
suggestive that something terrible is happening to prevent SYNCs from
completing.

-- 
When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"