Fri Feb 14 12:26:51 PST 2014
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Wide Area Replication, Add Set, without index?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] subscriber node has wrong localnodeid after initial sync
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Vick Khera <vivek at khera.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Tory M Blue <tmblue at gmail.com> wrote: > >> so I'm wondering how do I change my scripts to create the index's at the >> end? I obviously can't drop the index on the master or everything will go >> to heck in a hand basket, but is there an instruction set when I'm adding a >> node and adding sets to that node, to tell it to ignore the indexes? >> > > I'm pretty sure slony disables indexes while copying, then re-builds them > after it is done. > Actually I believe this is beyond slony. The schema tells postgres what to do, so if it's creating indexes when the table is created, seems like everything pauses / waits for the index to be done, before moving on to the next table copy. So I think editing the schema to do the indexes at the end or not at all (make it manual), one should be able to use that schema on a remote slon host, that host will not pause to create indexes, and allow slony to push the data without a significant pause (some of our indexes have taken 4+ hours to create). I'm going to test this anyways, I don't see anything particular to slon to stop this behaviour Thanks Tory -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20140214/e4371ffc/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Wide Area Replication, Add Set, without index?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] subscriber node has wrong localnodeid after initial sync
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list