Thu Dec 12 06:31:29 PST 2013
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony1-2.2.1 build fails because port.h is not found
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony1-2.2.1 build fails because port.h is not found
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/12/2013 03:49 AM, Sandeep Thakkar wrote: > The development package postgresql92-devel-9.2.6-1PGDG.rhel5.x86_64.rpm > and postgresql93-devel-9.3.2-1PGDG.rhel5.x86_64.rpm at > http://yum.postgresql.org/rpmchart.php > > also has the port.h in the server include. libpq-dev seems to install port.h in /usr/include/postgresql root at debian:~/slony1-engine# dpkg-query -S /usr/include/postgresql/port.h libpq-dev: /usr/include/postgresql/port.h http://packages.debian.org/sid/i386/libpq-dev/filelist The RPM packages don't port port.h there. How about the attached patch? We will add the server includes back in on pgport builds for slonik. > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Sandeep Thakkar > <sandeep.thakkar at enterprisedb.com > <mailto:sandeep.thakkar at enterprisedb.com>> wrote: > > I see the port.h also present in the postgresql-server-dev package. > Here is the list: > > http://packages.debian.org/sid/i386/postgresql-server-dev-9.3/filelist > > if you build the sources, you will find port.h always in server include. > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Steve Singer > <ssinger at ca.afilias.info <mailto:ssinger at ca.afilias.info>> wrote: > > On 12/11/2013 05:14 AM, Sandeep Thakkar wrote: > > How did you install postgresql on Debian? I have built > PosrgreSQL > sources on CentOS, OSX and Windows and the port.h is > installed in > include/postgresql/server/__port.h and > include/postgresql/internal/__port.h > on all platforms. > > > > The packages from apt.postgresql.org <http://apt.postgresql.org> > > > > > On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Steve Singer > <ssinger at ca.afilias.info <mailto:ssinger at ca.afilias.info> > <mailto:ssinger at ca.afilias.__info > <mailto:ssinger at ca.afilias.info>>> wrote: > > On 11/29/2013 04:30 AM, Sandeep Thakkar wrote: > > The only work around I see now if to set the > CPPFLAGS in the > environment > to the server include directory, so that > CPPFLAGS_CLIENT takes > it in the > Makefile.global. > > > > So in debian (or at least with Wheezy) where the > original bug 315 > was reported > > > libpq-dev puts port.h in /usr/include/postgresql/port.h > so it gets > picked up by the client include paths. I am able to do > a build with > --with-pgport > > This isn't actually a problem on debian, is the problem > on OSX that > port.h isn't being put in the libpq header directories? > Should it? > Where do other platforms/distributions put port.h ? > > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Steve Singer > <ssinger at ca.afilias.info > <mailto:ssinger at ca.afilias.info> > <mailto:ssinger at ca.afilias.__info > <mailto:ssinger at ca.afilias.info>> > <mailto:ssinger at ca.afilias. > <mailto:ssinger at ca.afilias.>____info > > <mailto:ssinger at ca.afilias.__info > <mailto:ssinger at ca.afilias.info>>>> wrote: > > On 11/26/2013 04:14 AM, Sandeep Thakkar wrote: > > Hi > > I was building Slony1-2.2.1 sources on Mac > OS X and > found that > the build > fails because of: > > slonik.c:49:18: error: port.h: No such > file or directory > CPPFLAGS is now defined to just > CPPFLAGS_CLIENT that > does not > include > the PG "server" include directory > > ('<pginstall>/include/______postgresql/server' contains > > port.h). Any > > specific > reason why this change was made in 2.2.1? > > > > http://www.slony.info/______bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=315 > <http://www.slony.info/____bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=315> > > <http://www.slony.info/____bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=315 > <http://www.slony.info/__bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=315>> > > > > <http://www.slony.info/____bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=315 > <http://www.slony.info/__bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=315> > > <http://www.slony.info/__bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=315 > <http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=315>>> > > On systems that have multiple versions of > postgresql > installed might > pull in files for the client from one version > and server > includes > from another. You used to be able to get away > with this > but in more > recent versions of PG this breaks things. > > I am not exactly sure what the best way to > deal with this > in the > PGPORT case? I have a feeling just adding the > server > includes back > in on --with-pgport builds will get us back to > the bug 315 > situation > > > > > > -- > Sandeep Thakkar > > > > _____________________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > Slony1-general at lists.slony.______info > <mailto:Slony1-general at lists. > <mailto:Slony1-general at lists.>____slony.info <http://slony.info> > <mailto:Slony1-general at lists.__slony.info > <mailto:Slony1-general at lists.slony.info>>> > http://lists.slony.info/______mailman/listinfo/slony1-______general > <http://lists.slony.info/____mailman/listinfo/slony1-____general> > > <http://lists.slony.info/____mailman/listinfo/slony1-____general > <http://lists.slony.info/__mailman/listinfo/slony1-__general>> > > > > > <http://lists.slony.info/____mailman/listinfo/slony1-____general > <http://lists.slony.info/__mailman/listinfo/slony1-__general> > > <http://lists.slony.info/__mailman/listinfo/slony1-__general > <http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general>>> > > > > > > -- > Sandeep Thakkar > > > > > > -- > Sandeep Thakkar > > > > > > -- > Sandeep Thakkar > > > > > -- > Sandeep Thakkar > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Use-server-includes-for-pgport-when-building-slonik.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 0 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20131212/3c729a76/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony1-2.2.1 build fails because port.h is not found
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony1-2.2.1 build fails because port.h is not found
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list