Mon Sep 10 13:11:21 PDT 2012
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Using Slony to migrate from PostgreSQL 8.2 to 9.2
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony lagging, no errors, due to bulk data change?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Le 10/09/2012 19:54, Vick Khera a écrit : > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:26 PM, "Stéphane A. Schildknecht" > <stephane.schildknecht at postgresql.fr > <mailto:stephane.schildknecht at postgresql.fr>> wrote: > > I wondered if there was a magic plan I could rely on to ease my multiple > node replication cluster. > > As there isn't any magical plan, I will have to consider in more deep > details the idea of a two phase migration, as proposed by Christopher. > > > I think the magic would be "go back in time and do not wait so long > between major version upgrades." That is the key point. I won't try to explain that I was no decision-maker in that story. > > It certainly will be safest to do the multi-step upgrade. I'd guess you > don't need to do multiple steps for every node in your cluster depending > on how they are used... Not every one of them, but surely more than one. S. PS : To be complete, I join the error I got when trying to compile Slony 1.2 with PG 9.2 : slony1_funcs.c: In function ?_Slony_I_logTrigger?: slony1_funcs.c:515:38: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ... - -- Stéphane Schildknecht http://www.Loxodata.com Contact régional PostgreSQL -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBOSWkACgkQA+REPKWGI0Hd5wCeOosDZK7dhR3FNedasyeMaGBv /ksAoJSLsGFra9SUXT0J4iFUbW8bYfpf =cOEp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Using Slony to migrate from PostgreSQL 8.2 to 9.2
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony lagging, no errors, due to bulk data change?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list