Tue Sep 13 15:34:32 PDT 2011
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] PostgreSQL 9.1 support?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] PostgreSQL 9.1 support?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
OK, it's slonik.c 1909 and 1995 in beta1.... I guess that could be different in more recent versions. else if ((adminfo->pg_version >= 90000) && (adminfo->pg_version < 90100)) /* 9.0 */ I changed the second version to 90200 to include all v9.1s, might be right, might not. On 13/09/11 23:29, Dan Goodliffe wrote: > I've been playing with 9.1 and slony 2.1.0 betas. > Without digging into the code again (I can if you want) there are two > places where it checks the server version number (major.minor in the > form of 90100 I think) but treats anything above 90000 as unsupported > and goes for 8.4 support... which doesn't work. > I manually changed those points to be 90100 and it worked like charm. > > On 13/09/11 23:24, Steve Singer wrote: >> CS DBA wrote: >>> Setting up with a 9.1 rc1 master& 9.0.4 slave I get this: >>> >>> >>> <stdin>:7: Possible unsupported PostgreSQL version (90100) 9.1, >>> defaulting to 8.4 support >>> <stdin>:19: loading of file >>> /opt/app/postgres/91rc1/share//slony1_funcs.sql: PGRES_FATAL_ERROR >>> ERROR: could not find function "_Slony_I_resetSession" in file >>> "/opt/app/postgres/904/lib/slony1_funcs.so" >>> ERROR: could not find function "_Slony_I_resetSession" in file >>> "/opt/app/postgres/904/lib/slony1_funcs.so" >>> >> You don't tell us which version of slony you are using. >> resetSession is a new function that was added sometime during the 2.1.0 >> betas. >> >> Is it possible that you are trying to use the 2.1.0 slony_funcs.sql file >> with a slony 2.0.x shared library. It *looks* like that from your >> output but if there is another issue with 2.1.0 we'd like to know >> about it. >> >> As Chris said both of us have done testing against 9.1 betas with 2.1.0 >> and 2.0.7. You will see the "Possible unsupported PostgreSQL >> version..." message because we didn't want to remove that until 9.1 was >> actually released. >> >> Steve >> >> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Doesn't 2.0? >>>> >>>> Jan >>>> -- >>>> Sent from a mobile device >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: CS DBA<cs_dba at consistentstate.com> >>>> Sender: slony1-general-bounces at lists.slony.info >>>> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:33:28 >>>> To:<slony1-general at lists.slony.info> >>>> Subject: [Slony1-general] PostgreSQL 9.1 support? >>>> >>>> Hi All; >>>> >>>> Anyone know if/when and what version of SLONY will support PostgreSQL 9.1? >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance >>>> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Slony1-general mailing list >> Slony1-general at lists.slony.info >> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general -- Dan Goodliffe 07970 523693 dan.goodliffe at randomdan.homeip.net
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] PostgreSQL 9.1 support?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] PostgreSQL 9.1 support?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list