On 10-11-18 03:02 PM, Paweł Tęcza wrote:
> Dnia 2010-11-18, czw o godzinie 18:03 +0100, "Stéphane A. Schildknecht"
> pisze:
>>
>> Hi,
>
> Hello Stéphane,
>
> At first, thank you very much for your response!
>
>> First of all, you should use slony 1.2.21.
>
> Hm. It can be hard, because I use Debian stable (Lenny). But I can try
> to grab slony package for Debian testing (Squeeze) or backport for Lenny
> if it exits.
>
> BTW, why don't you recommend me slony 1.2.15? Is it really so obsolete?
>

http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=slony1

Isn't 1.2.21 available for lenny from backports?

See 
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=slony1-engine.git;a=blob;f=RELEASE;h=2081b98b80bdfb6b79e1baf5410da1eb26da01a4;hb=ce58f4a4f3b57a712d35c1e8420c66562117a7e2

for a list of bugs fixed between 1.2.15 and 1.2.21 the decision is yours.



>> Second, there is no limitation on the number of databases your master hosts.
>
> It's good to hear that :)
>
>> Personally, I work with slony1_ctl (http://slony1-ctl.projects.postgresql.org/)
>> to deal with my replications. So I'm afraid I can't help choosing between perl
>> or slonik scripts.
>
> I have never heard about slony1_ctl. Could you please write more about
> that tool? Maybe any examples of usage? What advantages over slonik has
> slony1_ctl utility?
>
> Kind regards,
> Pawel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at lists.slony.info
> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general