On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 06:57:05PM -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
> Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info 
> 
> > One of our customers is looking to deploy this in an almost unattended 
> > environment, and having memory leaks in Slon will most definitely hurt 
> > their ability to deploy it with confidence.
> > 
> > I would prefer to see the patch incorporated in 2.0.4 and have people 
> > test the RC1 than have it included after 2.0.4 in the hopes that people 
> > would test the CVS version.
> 
> What do others think?

I think the right thing to do is fix the leak and if needed, roll more
RCs.

It's already asking a lot of people to test RCs.  Asking people to
pull from some random SCM system and test that will trim that already
tiny group.

> I take it your offering to give the leak memory hanges a good workout 
> before we tag 2.0.4 final?

I suspect I can find people who will :)

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david at fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter at gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate