Slon 1.2.20 (For now as I migrate to 8.4 )

Just working out a new Slon setup, with a cascade configuration.

! master talking to 2 Slaves (if not more), that talk to 2-3 Qslaves.

Is it wrong to have both Slaves talking, replicating to both QSlaves?

1 Master
2 Pri Slave
3 Sec Slave
4 Pri QSlave
5 Sec QSlave

1-2
2-1
1-3
3-1
2-4
4-2
3-4
4-3
2-5
5-2
3-5
5-3

I don't see why this would be bad,. The biggest deal here is the
redundancy this provides, however if I'm creating too much overhead
than maybe need to create 2 paths for the data , vs having a fully
meshed env.

Thanks (hope that makes some sense)
Tory