Fri Aug 6 12:54:12 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] How To Define Replications Sets Properly
- Next message: [Slony1-general] FW: How To Define Replications Sets Properly
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fharid Salomon Fernandez wrote: > Hello, i'm new using this slony-I replication system, and i have little doubts about defining the replications sets. > In the slony-i documentation it says that i have to group those tables that are related via foreign key constraints in one set, so the objetive > here is to have varoius sets from one database, the problem is that , i have a large database where all the tables are related, for example > i have some tables for the human resources module, those tables are related (employees, location, etc) and some of those tables are related to > tables from other modules (sales, accounts, etc), so it means that i can't separate the tables in diferent sets because some of them act like bridges > relating all the tables from the database, and I have to define one big set with all the tables??? .... > please what can i do in order to have the correct number of replication sets from my database. > There isn't anything wrong with having all off your tables in one replication set. In fact, that is a very common way of deploying slony. > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > Slony1-general at lists.slony.info > http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general -- Steve Singer Afilias Canada Data Services Developer 416-673-1142
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] How To Define Replications Sets Properly
- Next message: [Slony1-general] FW: How To Define Replications Sets Properly
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list