Wed Apr 21 12:45:58 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] logswitch_finish( )
- Next message: [Slony1-general] logswitch_finish( )
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov at systemguards.com.ec> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> IS the logswitch_finish() command an acceptable method for forcing the >> replication engine to switch from 2 to 1 so I can vacuum full 2? >> > > i think that is what slony execute internally to make the switch, so i > think is safe to execute it... and after that sl_log_1 will be > truncated for slony so no vacuuming needed > sorry, slony will truncate sl_log_2 obviously... -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] logswitch_finish( )
- Next message: [Slony1-general] logswitch_finish( )
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list