Thu Apr 8 06:26:57 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Next message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4/6/2010 7:05 PM, Steve Singer wrote: > On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Jaime Casanova wrote: > >> well my main preocupation is to avoid developers to execute truncate, >> but maybe the answer is to revoke that privilege in 8.4 > > You could maybe also accomplish this by installing your own TRUNCATE trigger > that prevents the truncate with an error. > > At some point some thought/discussion should be put into the best way of > adding truncate support to some future slony version. It would require a special sl_log row so that the truncate is performed at the correct point within the sync. Just having T as the operation should do. Since it is a feature, I consider this a TODO for 2.1. Jan -- Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security. -- Benjamin Franklin
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Next message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list