On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg at sympatico.ca> wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>
>>> Slony 2.0.x currently also supports 8.3.
>>
>> what about a 2.1.x version? :)
>
> Putting new features into 2.1.x over 2.0.x might make some sense.  Do we
> (the community of slony users) want to require 8.4+ for 2.1.x? I think that
> is open for discussion.  My initial thoughts are that we want to keep each
> version of slony compatible with as many versions of Pg as possible both to
> make upgrading Pg with slony easier and to make it easier for us to eol
> slony versions.
>

well my main preocupation is to avoid developers to execute truncate,
but maybe the answer is to revoke that privilege in 8.4

-- 
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157