Here it is: =

http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-commit/2009-January/002423.html
I don't know if you should see sl_log tables not empty, I guess they =

shouldn't be if your database is updating often.

Nimesh Satam wrote:
> Nickolay,
>
> Thanks for your help. I am new to slony and not sure from where to get
> the new updates and bug fixes. Can you direct me where I can get this
> patch?
>
> Also would really appreciate if you can give me some guidelines about
> the sl_log_1 and sl_log_2 tables. Most of the replication if working
> fine, But the two tables never seem to get empty.
>
> Thanks for all your help.
>
> Regards,
> Nimesh.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Nickolay <nitro at zhukcity.ru> wrote:
>   =

>> Hi,
>>
>> Chris has posted update for slony1_funcs script. You should update yours.
>> Anyway, even though I had problems when I was trying to use
>> cleanup_deletelogs parameter, it doesn't mean it's connected to this
>> parameter. May be something else went wrong. It's just that my nodes were
>> out of sync (differ too much), but sl_status showed they are in sync. You
>> should just compare your nodes' data and make sure they all match.
>>
>> Nimesh Satam wrote:
>>     =

>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Can any body let us know if we should be keeping the
>>> "cleanup_deletelogs" parameters as true? We are facing problem in
>>> getting sl_log_1 and sl_log_2 been truncated.  Will keeping this
>>> parameter on help us?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Nimesh.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Slony1-general mailing list
>>> Slony1-general at lists.slony.info
>>> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       =

>
>
>   =

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20090122/=
f8892078/attachment.htm