Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 12/11/2009 8:32 AM, Brad Nicholson wrote:
>> On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 11:59 +0000, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>>
>>> However, I've used 1.2.15 in the past and never had any problems. It
>>> might be prudent to stick to 1.2.* if everything is fine already,
>>
>>
>> I'd recommend sticking with 1.2.x for now.
>>
>
> I have plans for testing and doing a detailed code review. But it's
> going to take some time. At this point I'd second that 2.0 is not ready
> for production.


Any ideas on my issue before I scrap it and try 2.0+?


http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/2009-December/010217.html