Lukas lukas at fmf.vtu.lt
Sat Sep 20 02:25:45 PDT 2008
Hello,

So in general we could say that Slony 2.0 still not for production.. ;[
And for production should be used 1.2.15, right?

Lukas

>> From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs at crankycanuck.ca>
>> >
>> >  I would like to ask is Slony 2.0 version stable and
>> ready to put in
>> > production, or it is better to use more tested and
>> older version 1.2.x?
>>
>> Well, Slony 2.0 has a bunch of new features.  I don't
>> think I will
>> personally be in a big hurry to put it to production
>
> Similar feelings. 1.2.1x is working well here and I'm aware of most of
> it's quirks (well I say that, but I always feel the more I learn about
> something the more I realize I don't know).
>
> But it's been one of my intentions for a while to grab 2.0 and have a
> "play", it sounds like once any teeting problems are discovered and weeded
> out it'll be ace.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at lists.slony.info
> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by OpenProtect(http://www.openprotect.com), and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by OpenProtect(http://www.openprotect.com), and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the Slony1-general mailing list