Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 11:24:37PM +0200, Cyril SCETBON wrote:
>   
>> Don't you think Slony should check if an earlier transaction exists but 
>> also if relations locked (in that transaction) are concerned by the 
>> replication ?
>>     
>
> There's no way for Slony to know this.  I agree it would be nice, but it's
> simply impossible.  This is a consequence of the way MVCC in Postgres works.
>   
I was thinking that simply looking at pg_locks (known for hurting 
performance) would help.
> (I'm oversimplifying, note, because there are a few tricks in 8.3 and up
> that have solved some of these problems. 
ok
>  But that won't help you.)
>   
Damn :-(

Thanks
> A
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at lists.slony.info
> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
>   

-- 
Cyril SCETBON