Dane Miller <dane at greatschools.net> writes:
> Hi Slony Friends,
>   I just came across this typo in the MERGE SET documentation and wanted
> to let y'all know...
>
> http://slony.info/documentation/stmtmergeset.html
>
> In the example, WAIT FOR=1 should be WAIT ON=1
>
> Example
> # Assuming that set 1 has direct subscribers 2 and 3
>      SUBSCRIBE SET (ID = 999, PROVIDER = 1, RECEIVER = 2);
>      SYNC (ID=1);
>      WAIT FOR EVENT (ORIGIN = 1, CONFIRMED = 2, WAIT FOR=1);
>      SUBSCRIBE SET (ID = 999, PROVIDER = 1, RECEIVER = 3);
>      SYNC (ID=1);
>      WAIT FOR EVENT (ORIGIN = 1, CONFIRMED = 3, WAIT FOR=1);
>      MERGE SET ( ID = 1, ADD ID = 999, ORIGIN = 1 );

Already fixed in -HEAD; fixed this in the 1.2 branch.
-- 
"cbbrowne","@","acm.org"
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/lisp.html
I was just  wondering if the Chinese are busy trying  to deal with the
"Year Of The Dragon" bug.