Wed Jun 11 20:09:03 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] table truncation
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Add new slave to cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi I'm replicating a database with about a hundred tables using slony. I have a master node and a slave node. The memory usage of the slon processes are normally only a few MB. I have noticed however that adding a table named cdr.cdr_20080611 to the replication causes the memory use of the slon process for the slave node to raise to about 161 MB. even if the table is empty. After many tests I realized that the reason for this behavior is that I am using table id 20080611 when I add this table to a set. If I use a smaller table id, say 1000 this doesn't happen. According to my tests, the higher the table id the higher the memory usage on the slon process for the slave node. I think this is a bug since by choosing a high enough table id the memory consumption can become *very* large. I would appreciate it if you tell me what you think about that. By the way, I'm using slony 1.2.10 (but I haven't seen anything about this topic in the release notes for newer versions) Thanks Dami=E1n Quiroga Integratech S.A -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20080612/= 03a2a1d9/attachment-0001.htm
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] table truncation
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Add new slave to cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list