Tue Jun 10 03:21:01 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] slonik segfault
- Next message: [Slony1-general] slonik segfault
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christopher Browne wrote: > Cyril SCETBON <scetbon at echo.fr> writes: > >>> I set up a "node 201", and 512 simple tables, and had no trouble >>> wrapping it with a little bit of extra slonik to make it work. >>> >>> >> I suppose, you did not get the segmentation fault error >> > > Correct, I did not get a segmentation fault. > ok > >>> At the moment, it's 350-odd tables into the subscription process; I >>> don't anticipate any problems. >>> >>> >> I get the error immediately when I launch the slonik script that's why >> I think it's a parsing error. >> >> It really seems to be a buggy piece of code. >> > > And that does not particularly make sense in that: > a) I can't duplicate the problem, > b) Others haven't been reporting similar problems. > > We didn't create a parser out of whole cloth; we are using Flex and > Bison, which are *widely* used for this purpose. The FSF periodically > releases updates, demonstrating that bugs are periodically found, > however, we're not using any of the sorts of edges of these tools that > would lead me to expect us to be encountering bugs with those tools. > ok > There has *got* to be some difference between our environments that is > leading to this difference in behaviour; what more can you tell us > about your environment? > > - What OS platform? > Linux Debian Etch amd64 (X86_64) > - What version of PostgreSQL? > 8.2.4 > - What version of Slony-I? > 1.2.10 > - How did you get Slony-I installed (e.g. - "downloaded a binary RPM", or > "built from sources," ...)? > debian packages maintained by Peter Eisentraut > I recall (can't find it in notes :-() a patch not too long back where > we had a case where we ran free() on some arguments in slonik.c before > we used the values; it worked fine on all the platforms we had tried > this on, but someone had a platform where memory allocation worked > slightly differently and that broke. Given some precise version > information, maybe we can discover what is special about your platform > that something's breaking there. > Regards -- Cyril SCETBON
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] slonik segfault
- Next message: [Slony1-general] slonik segfault
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list