Christopher Browne cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info
Fri Jun 6 13:46:45 PDT 2008
Martin Eriksson <m.eriksson at albourne.com> writes:
> hmm could be i've missunderstood something...
>
> but it appears that move set does not change all the subscriptions to
> the orgin node?
>
> It appear that if i got
> 1 -> 3
> 1 -> 2
>
> and i do move set
> from 1-> 3
>
> 1 will subscribe from 3, but 2 will continue to subscribe from 1.
>
> how should I go about moving subscription on node 2 to point to 3 instead?

You can submit a SUBSCRIBE SET request to point node #2 to use node
#3.

Slony-I doesn't assume that *everything* should get redirected; it
tends to do the minimal change (which is, after all, what you asked
for!).  This is, in effect, the difference between DWIS and DWIM, that
is, Do What I Say versus Do What I Mean.

Historically, systems that try to implement DWIM tend to be rather
less predictable than those implementing DWIS, because their behaviour
has rather more complex policy bundled into it.
-- 
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="linuxfinances.info" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;;
http://linuxfinances.info/info/nonrdbms.html
Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway. 


More information about the Slony1-general mailing list