Fri Feb 29 06:28:16 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] gmake rpm vs tarball
- Next message: [Slony1-general] few typos in documentaion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I confirm. I took the time to reinstall postgres & slony from scratch with rpm it and, so far, it works. I'm glad to know i will not require a compilation env on prod ;-) Soon, i'll have to do the same for a rhel-4-x86_64. So stay tuned. rgds 2008/2/28, Devrim G=DCND=DCZ <devrim at commandprompt.com>: > > Hi, > > On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 11:53 +0100, lio bod wrote: > > That's a while you answered me and i noticed i forgot to thank you. > > So please consider, that's done now. > > You are welcome. > > > Btw, i'm not an nor an linux neither an hardwhare expert and i have a > > doubt in front of the 'i686' suffix of the rpm: > > Could you confirm that the rpm you suggest me will fit my box > > RHEL-4/386. > > Yeah, it will fit. i686 is for processors P-2 and above. > > Regards, > > -- > Devrim G=DCND=DCZ , RHCE > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support > Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting > Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/ > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20080229/= 973ad47c/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] gmake rpm vs tarball
- Next message: [Slony1-general] few typos in documentaion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list