Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 06:57:20PM -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
>> Apparently there were 100's of these errors generated, yet, when 
>> researching the production data, it does not appear that there was any 
>> corruption.  Here is the text of one of the errors:
>>
>> relation with OID 394006 does not exist
> 
> Aha!  I'll bet lunch someone was doing DDL in their "shuffling data around". 
> That is an error message telling you that a previously-planned query is
> looking for a now-dropped relation.  One way to get this is indeed with temp
> tables, but you can get it by dropping regular tables &c.  I'd have a very
> good look at how that procedure from last Friday worked.
> 
> If you do DDL under Slony without passing it through EXECUTE SCRIPT, you
> _will_ get very strange results.

I only wish that was the problem.  Our application does not remove any 
tables.

-- 
Until later, Geoffrey

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
  - Benjamin Franklin