Wed Apr 9 11:51:29 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Postgresql upgrades and Slony
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Postgresql upgrades and Slony
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Christopher Browne wrote: > Vivek Khera <vivek at khera.org> writes: >> On Apr 8, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Jeff Frost wrote: >>> I think if the default event node wasn't always 1, but in fact the >>> current master, then things would be less painful when you end up >>> with a master that isn't node id 1. >> >> I think it would be even better if there was NO default event node. I >> intentionally avoid node number 1 just for this reason -- I can debug >> my scripts much more easily. > > Reviewing the parser, there only seem to be the following slonik > commands that use a default of 1: > > INIT CLUSTER has default ID = 1 > STORE NODE has default EVENT NODE = 1 > DROP NODE has default EVENT NODE = 1 > FAILOVER has default BACKUP NODE = 1 > EXECUTE SCRIPT has default EVENT NODE = 1 > UPDATE FUNCTIONS has default ID = 1 > REPAIR CONFIG has default EVENT NODE = 1 > WAIT FOR EVENT has default WAIT ON = 1 > > It doesn't take a very big patch to implement the requirement that these: > a) Default to -1, and > b) Error out if left as -1 I think that's pretty reasonable. It'll break all my scripts that depend on a default event node, but they're easily fixed. -- Jeff Frost, Owner <jeff at frostconsultingllc.com> Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/ Phone: 650-780-7908 FAX: 650-649-1954
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Postgresql upgrades and Slony
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Postgresql upgrades and Slony
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list