On 11/6/2007 9:16 AM, Jan Matousek wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I believe that the cross-version replication is possible.
> I have experience with 8.1 (master) and 8.2 (slave) replication, and
> it works fine.

Actually, one of the design goals of Slony-I was to be able to use it 
for the purpose of Postgres version upgrades with minimal downtime by 
using switchover.


Jan


> 
> j.
> 
> On Nov 6, 2007 1:38 PM, Geoffrey <lists at serioustechnology.com> wrote:
>> Is it absolutely necessary to have the same versions of Postgres on both
>> the master and slave?  Point is, we are currently running 7.4.16 on the
>> machines I plan to replicate, but thought I'd go with the lastest 7.4
>> version (18).  My ignorant assumption is that if you're going to have a
>> mis-match in versions, it's best to have the slave newer then the master.
>>
>> --
>> Until later, Geoffrey
>>
>> Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
>> temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
>>   - Benjamin Franklin
>> _______________________________________________
>> Slony1-general mailing list
>> Slony1-general at lists.slony.info
>> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at lists.slony.info
> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general


-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck at Yahoo.com #