Mon Jul 16 07:18:05 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Trouble with large DB and windows
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Trouble with large DB and windows
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Monday 16 July 2007 04:50:46 Al Rosenthal wrote: > I have thought about firewalls and timeouts. I just have two machines, > sitting next to each other connected by a switch. One has Vista, the other > XP. I tried running the slon engines on either one. I also tried changing > all of the IP settings available. I also tried adding a linux machine and > running the slon process on that machine. In every case, the machine that > is the slave failed after about 12 - 15 GB with a error 10055 (not enough > buffer space or enough tcp buffers). Also, the database I am trying to > replicate is very simple. One table, no indexes. Even the table is > simple. On serial column as primary key, the other is bytea data. > > Any suggestions? Based on the descriptions you have given, I'm fairly convinced that this is not a slony problem, but rather a PostgreSQL more specificaly a Windows problem, During the subscribe phase of the replication slony basicly mimics pg_dump | psql. The fact that you've moved the slon processes to a linux machine yet still get this error, pretty much confirms this for me. Some googeling around leads me to see the following: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-ports/2005-11/msg00000.php Which sounds like it could be exactly what you are experiencing. What version of PostgreSQL are we dealing with here? > > Al > > >> What I still can not do is replicate a 22 GB database. My initial > >> trials all failed after about 12 to 15 GB with an error 10055 in > >> the logs. According to windows knowlegebase, this is because of a > >> lack of TCP buffers. I followed microsoft's advice and edited the > >> registry and changed such things as the MaxUserPort and > >> TCPTimedWaitDelay and TcpNumConnections to their maximums. > > > >I wonder if you're timing out. What I know about Windows any more is > >very close to zero, but my suspicion is that you might be building an > >index or something that is taking a long time. You will have issued > >a command, and then you wait for it to complete. If the time to > >complete is longer than the time your settings are willing to wait, > >then you can get in trouble. (This could also be due to an > >intermediate firewall deciding that your session is "idle".) > > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > Slony1-general at lists.slony.info > http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general -- Darcy Buskermolen The PostgreSQL company, Command Prompt Inc. http://www.commandprompt.com/
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Trouble with large DB and windows
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Trouble with large DB and windows
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list