Mon Sep 25 11:51:33 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] slony files in share
- Next message: [Slony1-general] slony files in share
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 11:30:45AM -0700, Darcy Buskermolen wrote: > B) I've run into a situation where I want to run 2 diffrent versions of slony > (on 2 diffrent DB's) on the same cluster. While yes I can do it via > manipulation of the configure options, this feels cumbersome. What are > proples thoughts on expanding on the first item and, moving the files one > level deeper, share/slony-I/1.3 , and going along with this, would it be > worth while to do something simular the same thing with the .so's ? Yuck. The whole point of configure options is that they be possible for the expert, and troublefree for the newbie. "Cumbersome" is what one expects when making a tricky tool do tricky things in a tricky way. No? A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness. --George Orwell
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] slony files in share
- Next message: [Slony1-general] slony files in share
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list