Dave Page dpage
Fri Sep 22 08:33:48 PDT 2006
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Browne [mailto:cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info] 
> Sent: 22 September 2006 16:08
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Configure update
> 
> "Dave Page" <dpage at vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
> > Unfortunately I found a bug in CVS tip earlier that prevented
> > compilation of Slony on Windows with PostgreSQL 8.2. I've corrected
> > the bug but it meant that I had to regenerate the configure
> > script. I've tested on Linux and Windows and all seems OK, but it's
> > probably worth any testers double checking on their platforms as
> > we're so close to release.
> 
> Just to be clear about the nature of the resolution...  Tell me if I'm
> misunderstanding things...
> 
> - The Windows issue required patches to config/acx_libpq.m4 and
>   makefiles/Makefile.win32, which I see in the patch
> 
> - You then regenerated configure

Yes.

> If that's the story, I don't see any grand problem with that.  You
> used version 2.59, when the last "gen" I did used 2.60.  I now have
> 2.60a installed (apparently that was released in late August); based
> on the NEWS file for autoconf, there shouldn't be any grand issues
> about compatibility.
> 
> Per NEWS.Debian:
>   This package should be largely compatible with older Autoconf
>   releases back to 2.50, and especially with 2.59.
> 
> What's unfortunate is that any little change in the m4 code combined
> with variations in autoconf versions has pretty inordinately large
> effects on the contents of ./configure

Yes, it is annoying.

> It's worth doing some extra builds to double-check that everything
> compiles, but I don't see this requiring any sort of "full test
> cycle."  It works fine for me on my dev box (Debian/Linux, IA-32)...

I'm just being cautious - don't want to have broken the final release
for anyone and not have an excuse :-)

/D



More information about the Slony1-general mailing list