Tue Sep 19 09:22:40 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Migrating From gBorg
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Migrating From gBorg
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:19:26AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > > to me that what we need to do is nail down -- whether for Slony or > > for the PostgreSQL project more generally, if people like -- what > > sort of service we would _like_, and how we are willing to compromise and ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > What I'm pointing out is that that's the wrong way to think about > it. 100% of deficiencies with pgFoundry are curable by an > application of sysadmin time. You don't know that, and neither does anyone else, because we haven't got a list of requirements. So let's get that, and then we can discuss what we ought to do. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca "The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying November. --H.W. Fowler
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Migrating From gBorg
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Migrating From gBorg
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list