> -----Original Message-----
> From: slony1-general-bounces at gborg.postgresql.org 
> [mailto:slony1-general-bounces at gborg.postgresql.org] On 
> Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan
> Sent: 19 September 2006 11:44
> To: slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Migrating From gBorg
> 
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:11:19PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > 
> > If your conclusion is that pgFoundry is borked and we need 
> to replace it 
> > with something else *in general*, then let's replace it.
> 
> I think the conclusion is twofold:
> 
> 1.	pgFoundry is not sustainable in the long run, because of the
> problems Chris raised.

Why? Who says we've gotta keep upgrading? If we need any specific new
features in the future then there's a good chance we'd have to scratch
our own itch anyway, regardless of the status of the original project.

> 2.	We need something _right now_, because it's plain that gborg
> isn't a reasonable holding pattern any more.

Gborg is as secure as any of our other sites again. Believe it or not it
really was a freak set of circumstances that led to the outage - and
provisions have and are being put in place to prevent a recurrance.

Regards, Dave.