Wed Mar 22 07:40:25 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slon not catching up
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slon not catching up
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mar 21, 2006, at 10:05 PM, Rod Taylor wrote: > 400GB at 2B transactions/year already requires nearly double hardware > (CPU & RAM) to get through the initial data copy as would otherwise be > required for standard DB operation. Lack of VACUUM during this time > is a > killer. Emptying sl_log_1 with everything being in a single > transaction > at the beginning is also painful. For something this big, I'd want to do one table in a set at a time, and merge the sets as it completes each table.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slon not catching up
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slon not catching up
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list