Tue Mar 14 06:50:21 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Oids changing
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Feature Thought: Output from EXECUTE SCRIPT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 02:40:23PM -0000, Victoria Parsons wrote: > its not a problem. I started doing this when I got errors from programs > with a connection to postgres complaining because it could no longer > find table with oid XXX. It wasn't a table, I'll bet. The problem was likely that the _function_ disappeared. The query plans for the trigger functions are cached per connection. When you remove any of those functions, even if you re-add them, the old query plan is still there, and you get this error. The reference is by oid, and when you remove and re-add the trigger function, the oid reference now points to the wrong entry. > I've got to the stage where I'm adding new sets and tables to an > established cluster. After adding a new set and getting all current > subscribers to subscribe to this, will something funny happen to my new > tables that requires postgres connections to be re-established? To try Shouldn't do, no. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca The plural of anecdote is not data. --Roger Brinner
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Oids changing
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Feature Thought: Output from EXECUTE SCRIPT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list